표 8. | Table 8. 지역 및 연령집단별 PWP 이원변량분석 결과 | Two-way ANOVA results of PWP by region and age group

Source	Type III Sum of Squares	df	M Square	F	Sig.	Post-hoc
Corrected Model	1.446 (a)	31	.047	22.368	.000
Intercept	487.005	1	487.005	233,569.493	.000
Region	.025	3	.008	4.036	.007	** JL<SG
Age	1.261	7	.180	86.368	.000	* A<B, C, D, E, F, G, H* B<C, D, E, F, G, H* C, D, E<F, G, H
Region × age	.083	21	.004	1.902	.009	A: * GS<SGB: * JL, CC<SG
Error	1.222	588	67.362
Total	566.146	620
Corrected total	2.668	619

A=2;6–2;11, B=3;0–3;5, C=3;6–3;11, D=4;0–4;5, E=4;6–4;11, F=5;0–, G=6;0–6;11, H=7;0–7;11.
p<05,
p<.01,
p<.001.
PWP, proportion of whole-word proximity; JL, Jeolla; SG, Seoul & Gyeonggi; GS, Gyeongsang; CC, Chungcheong.